Skip links

PART THREE -

When the Same Things Feel Harder

On This Page...

1-When What You Have Available Changes

By the time I truly understood just how much capacity could influence weight loss, I was no longer at the beginning of my journey.

I had already lost a significant amount of weight.

I had overcome the binge eating and emotional eating that had once dominated so much of my relationship with food.

I had changed habits.

I had changed patterns.

I had studied weight management and nutritional therapy, and I was working as a weight-loss coach, helping other women with their own weight.

So if there was proof of anything by that point, it was that I was capable.

I had the knowledge, I had the skills, and I had already demonstrated that I could implement them.

And then I went through a period of my life that would eventually change the way I understood all of that.

To explain it properly, I need to tell you about Tracy.

Tracy started as my mentor and became one of my closest friends.

We came from very different backgrounds, but we had this ability to look at things differently together. She supported me through motherhood, work, qualifications and the periods when I was trying to hold everything together while completely exhausted.

We taught fitness classes together too for years.

Tracy was also one of the healthiest people I knew.

She managed healthy living within a gym and specialised in cancer rehabilitation, helping people who were living through and recovering from cancer.

And then Tracy was diagnosed with cancer herself.

I struggled enormously with the cruel injustice of it all.

Here was this incredibly fit, healthy woman who had spent so much of her life helping other people look after their health, including people affected by cancer, and now she was the one facing it.

She had daughters.

She had a life she loved.

We used to describe her as strong like a bull.

And when she died, I was devastated.

There was no sudden decision that my weight didn't matter anymore.

I didn't wake up one morning and decide I didn't care about my health, or that I was going to stop doing the things that had helped me lose weight.

I didn't consciously abandon the routines I had built or undo all the work I had done.

I just stopped thinking about it.

My head and my heart were consumed by loss, and very slowly, very gradually, the implementation of the routines and behaviours that had helped me get to that point began to slip away.

There wasn't a single moment I could point to and say, "That's when I stopped." It happened as my life began changing around the loss.

The gym where Tracy had worked didn't feel the same without her, and I couldn't comfortably go back there.

Teaching became incredibly difficult too. I tried to continue, but I would find myself standing in front of a class trying to teach while I was sobbing.

There were songs we had used together, routines we had taught together, and women in those classes who were grieving her too.

So much of an environment that had previously been a normal part of my life was now connected to Tracy and the fact that she was no longer there.

Eventually, I stopped teaching altogether.

And that wasn't a small change to my life. At the time I had been teaching around eight active classes every week, so when the classes disappeared, a huge amount of regular movement disappeared with them.

But I also lost income, routine, social connection and a part of my identity at a time when I was already trying to live with the loss of one of the people who had supported me through enormous parts of my life.

Then the way I was eating began changing too.

Again, there was no decision to throw my eating plan away. I just stopped being as mindful about the food choices I was making and stopped meal prepping in the way I had before.

I started relying more on foods that were convenient, because convenience was what I needed. And as the income I had lost began affecting my everyday life, affordability mattered more too. Cheap, quick, budget meals became a practical way of getting myself and my family fed.

And I want to be really clear about something here.

Some of those changes absolutely affected my weight loss. If the way you are eating changes, your movement reduces and the routines that were supporting your weight loss begin disappearing, your weight may stall or you may begin regaining some of it.

But there are also periods in life when what you are experiencing goes far beyond what you could reasonably have expected or prepared for.

Sometimes getting through that period has to take priority.

There was nothing wrong with me needing convenience or choosing food partly because it was cheap.

There was nothing wrong with not having the same amount of time, energy or headspace available for meal prepping, planning and exercise while I was trying to survive one of the most painful periods of my life.

What became far more damaging was the emotional weight I attached to those changes.

Because I didn't look at myself and think, "My life has changed enormously. I'm grieving. My income has changed. I don't have what I normally have available right now, so what can I realistically keep doing while I get through this?"

I thought, "You should know better."

And underneath that was another belief I had carried through so much of my weight-loss history.

If I couldn't do it properly, if I couldn't be fully committed and fully adherent to the way I believed I should be doing things, then somehow I wasn't doing it at all.

There was very little room in my thinking for life to become difficult and for my approach to change with it.

There was no middle ground between doing everything I believed I should be doing and feeling as though I had stopped altogether.

No thought of asking what I could still manage with what I had available.

I didn't yet understand that sometimes maintaining something, however small, while life is asking more from you can be very different from abandoning yourself completely.

And perhaps most importantly, I didn't understand that a difficult period didn't have to become a permanent one.

Because the longer I struggled, the more emotional weight I attached to the fact that I was struggling. And the more I told myself I should know better, the harder it became to give myself any grace for what was actually happening.

Then, as my weight began increasing, that "you should know better" belief became even louder.

Because remember where I was by this point. I wasn't the woman at the beginning of my story who didn't understand weight loss.

I was qualified in weight management and nutritional therapy. I was a weight-loss coach.

So I thought I should know better.

And because I thought I should know better, I became increasingly frightened that everybody else would think I should know better too.

That shame changed my behaviour again. I started isolating myself, and there were times when I didn't even want to go walking because I was frightened somebody might see me and notice that I had regained weight.

When I eventually looked at the difference between my life before Tracy died and the life I was living afterwards, it was enormous.

I had gone from being dedicated to the way I was eating, extremely active, teaching around eight classes a week, socially connected and earning a full-time wage...

To becoming increasingly reclusive, barely moving, no longer paying much attention to what I was eating, financially struggling and carrying an enormous amount of grief and shame.

And over that period, I regained around four stone.

If I had looked at that period only through the lens I had used for most of my life, the conclusion would have been painfully familiar.

I had stopped doing the things that worked, I had regained weight, and therefore I had failed again.

But when I eventually began looking at what had actually happened through the lens of capacity, that explanation was nowhere near big enough.

Because my knowledge hadn't disappeared when Tracy died.

My qualifications hadn't disappeared.

The work I had already done on my emotional eating, binge eating, habits and patterns hadn't suddenly become meaningless.

And I hadn't somehow become incapable of doing things I had already proved I was capable of doing.

What had changed was what I had available to do them with.

My head and heart were carrying grief.

My everyday life had changed.

My movement, routine, work, income, social world and the way I was eating had all changed too.

And then the emotional weight I attached to those changes through shame, fear of judgement and the belief that I should know better placed even more demand on what I had available.

One enormous emotional event hadn't stayed neatly contained within one part of my life. It had reached into almost everything.

And as it did, it changed what I had available physically, mentally, emotionally and practically to keep implementing the behaviours that had previously supported my weight loss.

That was when I began to understand just how significant capacity could be.

Not as an excuse for what I did or didn't do, and not as a way of pretending my behaviours no longer mattered. They mattered enormously, and those changes in my behaviour contributed to my regain.

But capacity helped me understand what had been happening underneath those changes.

And once I understood that, something else occurred to me.

In my entire personal weight-loss history, I couldn't remember a single time when anybody had asked me to consider my capacity.

I had been taught to think about what I ate, how much I ate, how much I moved, whether I was sticking to the plan and whether I was motivated enough, disciplined enough or trying hard enough.

But nobody had ever asked me what I actually had available physically, mentally, emotionally and practically to keep doing all of those things.

For so long, I had looked at weight-loss behaviours almost in isolation.

Was I eating in a way that supported my weight loss?

Was I moving enough?

Was I sticking to what I had planned?

Was I doing what I knew I needed to do?

But I had never been encouraged to look at what was happening to the woman who was being asked to keep doing all of those things.

And that changed the way I understood this entire period of my life.

It took me a while to get back to my old eating habits, the gym, and back to teaching. And for a long time, I even carried the belief that Tracy would have been disappointed in me for what had happened after she died.

Looking back now, I know her well enough to know she probably would have kicked my ar*e for ever believing that.

But this is why Tracy's story became so important to my understanding of capacity.

It showed me something that years of focusing almost exclusively on food, exercise, discipline and weight loss had never taught me to look for.

Sometimes the behaviour we are trying to fix is happening downstream from something else.

I could have kept looking at the movement I had stopped doing, how I was eating or the weight I had regained. But unless I also looked at what had happened to the woman who was being asked to do those things, I was still looking at an incomplete picture.

Your version of this doesn't need to look anything like mine.

You don't need to have experienced bereavement or anything remotely comparable to what happened when I lost Tracy.

Sometimes capacity changes because something devastating happens.

Sometimes it changes because work becomes more demanding, your financial circumstances change, somebody you love needs more from you, your health changes, your sleep changes, your relationship changes or life simply enters a different season.

And sometimes the change can even be something you wanted.

A new relationship.

A better job.

A new baby.

A business.

A fuller social life.

Positive change still asks something from us.

So rather than only looking back and asking, "What went wrong when I started regaining weight?", there is another question I want you to begin considering.

What changed before my behaviour changed?

And what did that change ask from my capacity?

2- What I Had Never Learned to Look At

There was a word I eventually began using to describe what I was seeing across all of these different areas.

Capacity.

And once I understood what capacity actually meant, I realised it had been influencing my weight-loss experiences for years, even though I had never really been looking at it.

When I talk about capacity, I mean what you have available to you physically, mentally, emotionally and practically to do what you are asking yourself to do.

And that distinction matters.

Because your capacity is not the same thing as your capability.

You can be completely capable of doing something and still have very little available to do it with at a particular moment in time.

You can know how to prepare a meal and not have much physical energy left to prepare it.

You can know that one difficult eating decision doesn't mean you've ruined everything and still have very little mental or emotional space available to interrupt the all-or-nothing response when it appears.

You can know that movement supports you and still be navigating a period of your life where finding the time, energy or headspace for it feels considerably harder.

None of those things suddenly make you incapable.

The plan may not have changed.

Your knowledge may not have changed.

Your goal may not have changed.

You haven't suddenly become incapable.

But the conditions in which you are trying to implement those things may have changed enormously.

And so can what you have available to meet them.

That is capacity.

Sometimes you will have more available physically and less emotionally.

Sometimes you might have plenty of physical energy but your mind is carrying so much that even relatively small decisions feel exhausting.

Sometimes practical pressures take up enormous amounts of what you have available. Work, money, caring responsibilities, appointments, deadlines, unexpected problems and simply trying to keep everyday life moving.

And sometimes several of those things collide at once.

This doesn't mean that every time something feels difficult we simply say, "I didn't have the capacity," and remove all responsibility from ourselves.

Understanding capacity isn't about giving ourselves an excuse not to act.

It's about having a more accurate understanding of what may be influencing our ability to act, so that we can respond to it rather than simply judging ourselves for struggling.

Because once I could see capacity, I could begin asking very different questions.

Not only, "What do I need to do?"

But, "What am I asking myself to do, and what do I actually have available to do it with?"

And that changed a lot for me.

Because I eventually came to understand that capacity wasn't some small background factor in weight loss.

It could influence my ability to make decisions, manage my emotions, interrupt familiar patterns, prepare food, move my body, think ahead, adapt when something went wrong and keep implementing the things I already knew supported my weight loss.

It had been there all along.

I just hadn't known to look at it.

And strangely enough, I didn't fully understand just how powerful its influence could be until much later in my own journey.

By then, I had already learned a great deal about weight loss.

I had studied. I had trained. I had changed habits, worked on patterns and changed many of the behaviours that had once contributed to my own regain.

I wasn't the woman I had been at the beginning.

And then something happened in my life that changed almost everything I had available at once.

3- You Already Live With It

At this point, you might be thinking, "Great. So now capacity is another thing I need to get better at."

Another skill to learn.

Another area to work on.

Another thing you need to somehow improve before you can finally become better at losing weight.

But that's not what I'm asking you to take from this at all.

Because capacity isn't something new you need to acquire.

You've been living with it your entire life.

You've experienced days when you had plenty of energy, your head felt relatively clear and getting things done felt fairly straightforward.

You've experienced other days when things that would normally feel simple seemed to require far more from you.

You've probably had periods when you could plan ahead, prepare food, make decisions, move your body and deal with the unexpected without too much difficulty.

And you've probably had periods when just getting through everything already being asked of you felt like enough.

That was capacity too.

The difference is that you may never have been encouraged to recognise it as something that could influence your weight-loss behaviour.

So this isn't about becoming more capable.

It's about becoming more aware of what you have available, what is affecting it and what you are asking yourself to do with it.

Because capacity isn't fixed.

It can change from one day to another, from one week to another and across different periods of your life. And what affects it won't always be within your control.

There will be things you cannot change.

There will be things you cannot simply remove from your life.

And there may be times when what you have available is genuinely less than you would like it to be.

The goal isn't to somehow make sure you always have more.

It's to begin recognising when you might be able to build it, when it needs supporting, when some of what you have available needs protecting, and when what you are asking of yourself might need to reflect the reality of what you have available right now.

That doesn't mean your goals stop mattering whenever life becomes difficult.

It means the way you continue moving towards them doesn't always have to look exactly the same.

Because one of the things I eventually realised was that I had spent years treating any reduction in what I could do as though it meant I was no longer doing enough.

I hadn't learned to ask, "What can I do with what I have available today?"

I had learned to measure myself against what I believed I should be able to do.

And there is an enormous difference between those two questions.

One starts with the reality of the woman who has to implement the plan.

The other can leave her repeatedly judging herself against a version of herself she may not have the capacity to be that day.

So no, I'm not giving you another thing to become good at.

I'm inviting you to start noticing something that has been influencing you all along.

Because once you can see capacity, you can begin making different decisions around it.

You can begin noticing what supports it.

What strengthens it.

What protects it.

And, importantly, what may be unnecessarily taking from it.

Because some of the things using your capacity may be obvious.

A difficult week.

Poor sleep.

Work pressure.

Caring responsibilities.

Financial stress.

Illness.

Grief.

But others can be much easier to miss.

Sometimes it isn't only what is happening in your life that asks something from you.

Sometimes it's what you're carrying into it.

4- The Emotional Weight You Carry

In the last section, we started looking at some of the things that can affect what you have available physically, mentally, emotionally and practically.

Some of them are relatively easy to recognise.

Poor sleep.

A demanding week.

Financial pressure.

Illness.

Caring responsibilities.

Having too much to do and not enough time to do it.

But some of what we carry isn't nearly as visible.

And this is where I want to introduce you to something I call emotional weight.

When I talk about emotional weight, I'm not talking about your body weight.

I'm talking about the emotions, beliefs, meanings and expectations that can become attached to an experience and that we can continue carrying long after the experience itself has passed.

Because sometimes an experience ends, but what it leaves us carrying doesn't necessarily end with it.

You saw some of this in my story about Tracy.

Grief itself carried an enormous emotional weight. But over time, I added more to what I was already carrying.

I attached shame to the changes in my eating.

I attached judgement to my weight regain.

I told myself I should know better because of my qualifications and the work I did.

Then I became frightened that other people would judge me in the same way I was judging myself.

The circumstances were already incredibly difficult, but the meaning I attached to how I was coping with those circumstances gave me even more to carry.

And that's an important distinction.

Because we can't always prevent painful, stressful or difficult things from happening in our lives.

We won't always be able to remove the emotions that naturally come with them either.

Grief hurts.

Loss hurts.

Relationships can hurt.

Financial pressure can be frightening.

Life can be overwhelming.

Emotional weight isn't about pretending those perfectly human responses shouldn't exist.

It's also about recognising the additional weight we can sometimes place on ourselves because of what we decide those experiences, or our responses to them, mean about us.

And your history with weight loss can carry plenty of emotional weight of its own.

If you've lost weight before and regained it, what did you make that mean?

If you've started again more times than you can remember, what conclusion did you eventually draw about yourself?

If you've struggled with emotional eating, overeating, binge eating, impulsive eating or repeatedly found yourself doing something you had promised yourself you wouldn't do, what have you made those experiences mean about the kind of person you are?

Maybe you've decided you're inconsistent.

Maybe you think you lack discipline.

Maybe you believe you always give up eventually, that you can't trust yourself around food, that you sabotage your own progress or that you're simply someone who can't stick to anything.

Those aren't just descriptions of what happened.

They can become beliefs about you.

And when you carry those beliefs into the next attempt, you're not necessarily beginning with only a new eating plan and a desire to lose weight.

You may also be bringing the emotional weight of everything you believe happened last time.

The disappointment.

The guilt.

The shame.

The frustration.

The fear of letting yourself down again.

Maybe even years of promises you've made to yourself and haven't been able to keep in the way you intended.

And then there is that very small word we looked at earlier in this Guide.

Just.

Just eat less.

Just move more.

Just make better choices.

Just stick to it.

Just get back on track.

Why can't I just do this?

Earlier, we looked at how easily that word can make a complicated human experience sound like something you should simply be able to do.

Now I want you to consider what repeatedly hearing, or telling yourself, that you should "just" be able to do something might leave you carrying when you struggle to do it.

Because if something is supposed to be simple and you repeatedly struggle with it, eventually the problem can start to feel like you.

Another attempt that didn't last can become another reason not to trust yourself.

Another regain can become another piece of evidence that you're incapable.

Another Monday can become another promise you made to yourself and didn't keep.

And another moment of struggling with something you were told you should "just" be able to do can become another reason to ask, "What is wrong with me?"

None of those conclusions are weightless.

They ask something from you too.

Shame asks something from you.

Guilt asks something from you.

Constantly criticising yourself asks something from you.

Trying to prove that this time you'll finally get it right asks something from you too.

And now that you understand capacity, perhaps you can begin to see why this matters.

Because what you carry emotionally can become part of what is already using what you have available.

That doesn't mean responsibility disappears.

You can recognise that a behaviour contributed to weight regain without turning that behaviour into evidence that there is something fundamentally wrong with you.

You can take responsibility for a choice without punishing yourself for having made it.

And you can learn from where things have gone wrong without carrying every previous struggle forward as evidence against yourself.

So perhaps there is another question worth asking when you look back over your weight-loss history.

Not only, "Where did I go wrong?"

But, "What emotional weight did I pick up there that I'm still carrying now?"

Maybe it came from something you said to yourself.

Maybe it came from something somebody else said to you.

Maybe it came from repeatedly losing and regaining weight, from feeling judged because of your body, from being told you needed more willpower or from years of believing that if you could only be more disciplined, everything would finally fall into place.

And of course, weight loss doesn't happen separately from the rest of your life.

You may already be carrying emotional weight from relationships, family, work, money, health, grief, loss, disappointment, responsibility or experiences that have nothing whatsoever to do with food or your body.

The point isn't that you now need to empty yourself of every difficult feeling before you can successfully lose weight.

You don't.

It's awareness again.

Understanding that what you carry emotionally can affect what you have available, and that sometimes protecting your capacity may include learning not to add unnecessary emotional weight to something that is already difficult.

And as you've worked your way through this Guide, you may already be starting to see parts of your own history differently.

Something you previously saw as evidence that you weren't disciplined enough may look different now that you understand implementation.

A behaviour you once simply blamed yourself for may make more sense now that you can recognise the pattern underneath it.

A period when you thought you had failed may look very different when you consider what had changed in your life and what you actually had available at the time.

If that's happening for you, that's amazing.

Because changing what an experience means can change what you carry forward from it.

But intellectually understanding something doesn't always immediately remove the emotional residue it has left behind.

Think back to what we learned earlier about negativity bias and the way negatively charged experiences can become particularly significant in what we remember and learn from.

You can consciously understand that an experience doesn't mean what you once believed it meant and still notice an emotional response when something reminds you of it.

You can know that regaining weight doesn't prove you're incapable and still feel a flicker of doubt when you think about beginning again.

You can understand why a previous attempt became difficult and still carry some of the disappointment from it.

You can recognise that you've been far harder on yourself than you needed to be and still find that the old self-critical response appears automatically sometimes.

That doesn't mean the new understanding hasn't worked.

It means knowing something differently and feeling differently about it aren't always the same process.

And that's something we're going to come back to before you finish this Guide.

Because I don't only want to help you look back at your history and understand it differently. I also want to give you an opportunity to begin working with some of the emotional weight that history may have left behind.

For now, simply becoming aware of what you may still be carrying is enough.

Because there is another reason that emotional residue matters when we talk about repeated weight loss and regain.

When you've been disappointed enough times, regained enough times or made enough promises to yourself that didn't end the way you hoped, those experiences don't only belong to your past.

They can begin influencing what you expect from your future.

You can consciously want this time to be different while another part of you is already wondering what happens if it isn't.

And that anticipation doesn't only appear when you're thinking about starting another weight-loss attempt.

It can appear when you're planning to eat something you enjoy and part of your mind is already wondering whether this will be the thing that starts a binge.

It can appear when you're due to step on the scales and you're already preparing yourself for how you'll feel if the number isn't what you hoped to see.

It can appear when you have to socialise or walk into a room and part of you is already thinking about your body, whether people will notice your weight, what they might think or whether somebody will say something.

Nothing has necessarily happened yet.

The food hasn't started a binge.

You haven't stepped on the scales.

Nobody has looked at you, judged you or said a word.

But your previous experiences can mean that emotionally, you're already preparing yourself for what might happen next.

And when you've spent enough time expecting disappointment, judgement, loss of control or another experience you don't want to repeat, sometimes you begin protecting yourself from the impact before the impact has even arrived.

You brace.

And that has a capacity cost too.

5- When You Begin Bracing For Impact

At the end of the last section, we looked at something that can happen when previous experiences begin influencing what you expect from the next one.

You brace.

I use the words "bracing for impact" because that's honestly the best way I can describe what it eventually felt like for me.

When you've experienced judgement, disappointment, shame, loss of control or failure enough times, you don't necessarily wait for those things to happen again before you respond to them.

Sometimes you begin preparing yourself in advance.

I did this in so many areas of my weight-loss life without recognising what I was doing.

When I first started exercising publicly, I braced.

I was extremely conscious of my body and I anticipated what other people might think when they saw me exercising.

I could be worrying about whether somebody was looking at me, comparing myself with people who appeared fitter or slimmer, thinking about how my body looked while it moved or wondering what somebody might think if I needed to slow down or stop.

So the movement itself wasn't necessarily the only thing I was managing.

Part of my attention could also be monitoring the people around me and preparing for judgement that might never actually come.

And that meant the capacity required to exercise publicly wasn't only physical.

Before I had even considered the physical energy needed to move my body, I could already be using mental and emotional capacity managing everything I believed might happen while I was doing it.

I did it around food too.

There was a period when I had become so conscious of eating in front of other people that sitting down to eat could make me brace for what somebody might think about me because of my size.

One memory in particular has stayed with me for years.

I was out with my daughter when she was small, pushing her in her pram. I gave her a banana and started eating one myself because I was hungry.

I was living in a much larger body at the time and was incredibly conscious of what I imagined other people thought when they looked at me.

Somebody glanced in my direction.

And almost instantly, my mind supplied the judgement for them.

"As if you eat fruit, you heffer."

Nobody said that to me.

I didn't know what that person was thinking. They may not have been thinking about me at all.

But I had become so accustomed to anticipating judgement that I didn't actually need another person to judge me anymore.

My own mind could do it for them.

And I threw the banana away.

When I look back at that memory now, what strikes me is how completely ordinary the situation should have been.

There was no binge.

No takeaway.

No food I had labelled "bad".

No eating behaviour I was trying to hide.

I was hungry, so I was eating a banana.

But something as ordinary as eating when I was hungry had become emotionally loaded with my weight, my identity, shame and the judgement I imagined somebody else might place on me.

The judgement hadn't happened.

But I had already responded to it.

And experiences like that didn't stay isolated to one banana.

I began bracing when I sat down to eat. I could become conscious of who was around me, what I was eating and what somebody might think when they saw a woman of my size eating it.

At other times, the thing I was bracing for wasn't judgement from somebody else. It was what I feared the food itself might set in motion.

Will I lose control?

Will I binge?

Have I ruined everything?

Will this turn into days of eating?

Can I trust myself?

So while eating could physically be giving me energy, the meaning I had attached to eating meant that the physical and mental process I had become locked into around it could simultaneously be draining it.

I could be eating while tense.

Monitoring myself while eating.

Anticipating judgement while eating.

Worrying about what the food might lead to while eating.

Thinking about what I would need to do afterwards while I was still eating.

And that matters when we bring this back to capacity.

Because all of that was asking something from me.

The food itself wasn't necessarily the problem.

Sometimes it was the amount of mental and emotional energy I was using around the experience of eating it.

And I wasn't only doing this with food.

I could brace before exercising publicly.

I could brace before stepping onto the scales.

I could brace before seeing somebody who hadn't seen me since I had gained weight.

I could brace before an event where photographs might be taken.

I could brace when I thought I had gone off plan because I was already anticipating what might happen next.

Without realising it, I could spend an enormous amount of my available capacity preparing myself for things that hadn't happened yet.

And some of them never did.

The person looking at me didn't necessarily judge me.

The meal didn't necessarily lead to a binge.

The scales didn't necessarily show the number I feared.

One change to my plan didn't necessarily need to become a week of eating differently.

But if my mind had learned to anticipate those outcomes, I could begin responding to the possibility of them before I knew what was actually going to happen.

My experience became extreme, and I don't expect you to read my banana story and recognise yourself in it exactly.

You may never have thrown food away because somebody glanced at you.

You may never have experienced anything close to the level of anxiety around food and judgement that I eventually developed.

But bracing for impact doesn't always look dramatic.

Maybe you feel uncomfortable ordering certain foods in front of other people because you're conscious of your size, or choose what feels like the more acceptable option because you're wondering what somebody might think if you ordered what you actually wanted.

Maybe you're planning to eat something you enjoy while part of your mind is already monitoring whether you'll lose control, whether you'll regret it afterwards or whether this is going to become the start of a binge or a period of eating differently.

Perhaps you're due to step onto the scales and you're already preparing yourself for disappointment.

You haven't seen the number yet, but you're imagining what it might say, how you'll feel if it hasn't changed and what you'll make that result mean about the effort you've put in.

Maybe you're going somewhere socially and you're thinking ahead to who will be there, whether they've seen you since you've gained weight, whether they'll notice your body or whether somebody will make a comment.

Perhaps you've avoided a photograph because you're already anticipating how you'll feel when you see it.

Or maybe you're considering joining a gym, attending a class or simply walking somewhere more public and part of you is already imagining people looking at you, comparing you with everybody else or judging what your body can do.

Sometimes you might notice those thoughts clearly.

Other times, all you notice is that you feel tense, apprehensive, uncomfortable or strangely resistant to something that, on paper, doesn't appear particularly threatening.

And every one of those experiences can ask something from what you have available.

You may be using capacity monitoring yourself, anticipating somebody else's response, preparing for disappointment, managing anxiety or trying to prevent an outcome that hasn't happened yet.

And this is where I want to introduce another piece of what may be happening.

Because bracing for impact isn't only a figure of speech.

Anticipating something stressful can create a real stress response before the thing you're anticipating has actually happened.

Your stress response isn't a flaw. It's part of a protective system designed to help you respond when your brain perceives that something may require action.

When a threat or challenge is perceived, your sympathetic nervous system can become more active.

Adrenaline is involved in the body's more immediate stress response, while cortisol forms part of a wider hormonal response that helps make energy available and prepares the body to deal with what it believes may be coming.

Those hormones aren't bad.

We need them.

And a temporary stress response is a normal and useful part of being human.

But the important part when we're talking about bracing is that your brain doesn't necessarily need the thing you're anticipating to actually happen before that response can begin.

Perception matters.

That person didn't have to judge me eating the banana for me to experience the anticipation of judgement.

The scales don't have to show a gain for you to feel stressed while you're waiting to step onto them.

A meal doesn't have to lead to a binge for you to become anxious about whether it might.

Nobody at the gym has to look at you for you to enter the room already monitoring whether they will.

Your mind can anticipate the impact, and your body can begin preparing to respond to it.

And when that happens repeatedly, the cost isn't only that the experience feels unpleasant.

Frequent or prolonged stress can affect things that matter to weight loss too, including sleep, appetite and eating behaviour, concentration, decision-making, energy and how easy or difficult it feels to regulate your responses.

And those things can affect your capacity to keep implementing the behaviours that support your weight loss.

This is where I want to be careful, because cortisol has become one of those words that gets thrown around online as though it provides a simple explanation for body weight.

It doesn't.

I'm not suggesting that feeling anxious about the scales somehow overrides energy balance, that one stressful meal causes fat gain because your cortisol increased, or that reducing stress is some secret shortcut to losing weight.

The relationship between stress, hormones, eating behaviour and body weight is far more complex than that.

But that doesn't mean the stress response is irrelevant to weight loss either.

If repeated stress is affecting your sleep, hunger, appetite, energy, concentration or emotional responses, those effects can change the conditions in which you're trying to implement the behaviours that support weight loss.

And if you're already using mental and emotional capacity anticipating judgement, monitoring yourself around food, preparing for disappointment on the scales or trying to prevent yourself from losing control, you're asking even more from what you have available.

This is where bracing for impact begins connecting directly back to regain.

Because regain doesn't necessarily begin with one dramatic decision to stop trying.

As we've already seen, it can happen through changes in implementation over time.

And implementation requires something from you.

It requires decisions.

Planning. Attention.

Adaption.

The ability to pause before a familiar response, return after something doesn't go to plan and continue doing enough of the behaviours that support your weight loss over time.

Those things all draw on capacity.

So if part of what you have available is repeatedly being used by stress, shame, self-monitoring, fear of judgement or anticipation of another failure, that doesn't automatically mean regain will happen.

But it can change the conditions in which you're trying to prevent it.

And I think that's such an important distinction.

Because without understanding any of this, you might only notice the behaviour that eventually changes.

You stop preparing food as often.

You begin avoiding movement.

You struggle more with an eating pattern you thought you'd overcome.

You find it harder to make decisions.

Something goes off plan and returning feels more difficult than it normally would.

Then you look at those behaviours and conclude that you're doing it again.

You're losing motivation.

You're becoming inconsistent.

You're sabotaging yourself.

You're failing to stick to it.

But now there is another question available to you.

What has been asking something from my capacity before my behaviour started changing?

Because sometimes the previous regain doesn't stay neatly behind you as something that happened in the past.

The emotional weight of that experience, what you came to believe about yourself because of it and what you now expect to happen next can travel forward with you.

Which means you can enter a new weight-loss attempt genuinely wanting a different outcome while using some of the capacity you need to create that outcome preparing yourself for the possibility that you'll fail again.

That's why learning to recognise when you're bracing matters.

Not so that you can eliminate every stressful thought or somehow become completely fearless around food, movement, your body or the scales.

But because once you're aware of what is asking something from you, you have a better chance of learning how to support or protect what you have available.

And once I began looking at weight loss in this way, I had to reconsider two of the things I had spent years being told were the simple answer.

Eat less.

Move more.

Those principles still mattered.

But there was now another question I couldn't ignore.

What effect could the way I was trying to eat less and move more have on the capacity of the woman who had to keep implementing them?

6- Now We Can Talk About Food

Okay. Now we're going to talk about food.

And if you've been waiting for this bit, you're probably thinking, "It's about bloody time."

We've made it all the way to Part Three of a weight-loss Guide and, apart from looking at some of the behaviours and patterns that can happen around food, I haven't actually told you what I think you should be eating.

And I'm not going to.

But hear me out.

Because that doesn't mean what I'm about to share won't have value to you.

So please don't let your disappointment that I'm not about to reveal that the secret to fat loss is the perfect balance of protein, carbohydrates, fats and some magical combination of foods nobody has thought to tell you about yet stop you reading.

Because as we've already recognised, there's a good chance you have a huge vault of weight-loss information stored somewhere in your noggin already.

I know I did.

By this point in my life, I knew about calories. I knew about portion sizes.

I knew about protein, carbohydrates and fats.

I knew fruit and vegetables were good for me.

I knew about fibre and hydration.

I knew how to read a food label.

I knew which foods were more calorie dense and which ones would give me more volume for fewer calories.

I'd cut carbohydrates.

I'd counted calories.

I'd followed plans that allowed certain foods freely and, at times, interpreted "unlimited" as an invitation to eat far beyond the point of hunger or satisfaction.

I'd restricted.

I'd binged.

I'd eaten convenience food.

I'd eaten what I considered incredibly "clean".

After years of dieting, I had accumulated an enormous amount of information and experience around food and weight loss.

More information wasn't necessarily the missing piece.

But do you remember near the beginning of this Guide when I told you that changing my perception of my weight-loss history gave me one of the biggest lightbulb moments of my journey?

Well, perception gave me another one around food.

Because for years, I had largely judged whether an eating approach "worked" by what happened to my body weight while I was following it.

If I lost weight, it worked.

If I stopped following it and regained weight, I stopped working.

The approach had succeeded.

I had failed to keep implementing it.

But once I began looking at weight loss through everything we've explored throughout this Guide, I realised there was another way to look at that too.

An eating approach could be capable of producing weight loss while the way I was trying to implement it could simultaneously be making continued implementation harder.

Those two things could be true at the same time.

And I had plenty of evidence of that in my own history.

There were periods when I created extremely restrictive calorie deficits because, in my mind, eating less meant losing more and losing faster meant doing better.

But there can be a cost when the amount you're eating leaves you struggling to adequately fuel and nourish your body while you're also asking it to lose weight and function through everyday life.

Hunger can increase.

You can become increasingly preoccupied with food.

Energy can fall.

Concentration can become harder.

You might experience things such as brain fog, headaches or simply feel physically awful.

I lost count of the number of times I went to bed early because I was experiencing actual hunger pains and wanted to sleep through them.

And do you know how I perceived that at the time?

As winning.

I had been hungry and I hadn't eaten.

I'd beaten the hunger.

I'd stuck to my calories.

Surely that meant I'd had a successful day?

But look at that one small behaviour through the lens we have now.

I was hungry enough that I was changing when I went to sleep to avoid eating.

The next day, I didn't wake up having somehow become better at weight loss because I'd successfully ignored my body the night before.

I could wake up still hungry, thinking about food and with another day of restriction ahead of me.

And when food is already taking up more mental space, you're tired, you're hungry and you're asking yourself to continue resisting that hunger, what else might become harder?

Making decisions.

Concentrating.

Regulating an emotional response.

Interrupting an urge.

Responding flexibly when something doesn't go to plan.

Walking past the food you've been thinking about all day and making another deliberate choice.

One apparently successful act can create a much bigger chain reaction than I ever considered at the time.

And for somebody like me, with a history of bingeing and emotional eating, repeatedly creating the conditions in which I became intensely hungry and preoccupied with food wasn't happening in isolation from those patterns either.

Yet if I eventually ate more than I'd planned, I rarely traced the sequence backwards.

I looked at the final behaviour.

I couldn't control myself.

I'd failed again.

There were other times when I went in a completely different direction.

I've cut out carbohydrates before because I'd decided carbohydrates were the problem.

I've also followed approaches where certain carbohydrate-rich foods could be eaten very freely and taken that freedom much further than my hunger required because, in my mind, if the plan said I could have them, then I could have them.

Same woman.

Different rules.

And my behaviour around food could change in response to the meaning I attached to those rules.

Then there was another experience that taught me something slightly different.

Later in my journey, I worked with a weight-loss expert and personal trainer who gave me a calorie target of around 1,600 calories a day.

Fundamentally, the message was that what I ate within those calories didn't particularly matter for weight loss as long as I stayed around the target.

And at first I thought this was brilliant.

You mean I can eat whatever I want as long as it fits within 1,600 calories?

Fantastic.

I could have a McDonald's every day if I wanted to.

And technically, I could.

If I stayed within the calorie target and it maintained the energy deficit I needed, I could still lose weight.

And I did lose weight.

So I'm not going to rewrite that experience now and pretend the approach didn't work simply because that would make the story easier to tell.

It did work for reducing my body weight.

But what I hadn't really considered was what else I was getting for those calories.

If a large proportion of my daily calories went on food that gave me relatively little volume or didn't keep me satisfied for very long, I still had to live through the rest of the day.

And it wasn't long before I was hungry again.

So yes, I could fit the food into my calories.

But then I had to manage the hunger that came afterwards while trying not to exceed them.

And when much of what I was eating was highly processed and my overall diet wasn't giving me enough of the foods, fibre, protein and nutrients that helped me feel nourished and satisfied, I wasn't creating particularly supportive conditions for myself either.

My energy wasn't great.

I wasn't particularly satisfied.

My cravings became harder to manage.

I wasn't sleeping particularly well.

My skin wasn't great.

Physically and mentally, I began feeling pretty awful.

And eventually, maintaining what I was doing became harder.

Some of the bingeing and emotional eating behaviours I had previously worked so hard to change began creeping back in.

At the time, I didn't look at the conditions in which that was happening.

I looked at my behaviour.

The diet works when I stick to it.

I'm the part that stops working.

But again, look at that through the lens we have now.

Was 1,600 calories capable of creating an energy deficit that reduced my body weight?

Yes.

Was the way I was choosing to use those calories supporting me physically in a way that helped protect the capacity I needed to keep implementing it?

That's a completely different question.

And then, because apparently I enjoyed learning things by visiting every possible end of the spectrum, I went the other way.

There was a period in my life when I became completely locked in on eating almost entirely whole foods.

And honestly, to be fair, my diet looked like something out of a health magazine.

It was picture perfect.

I was eating plenty of nutritious foods. My meals had good volume. On paper, I was doing everything right.

And yet something strange started happening.

The only way I can describe it is that I felt empty.

And I couldn't understand it.

I'd eaten enough food that physically I knew I should be full. Sometimes I'd eaten a huge plate of food.

But there was still this strange hollow feeling, almost as though I was waiting for the next meal.

Then I'd eat the next meal.

And I'd feel the same again.

It wasn't that my body hadn't received food. It wasn't that the food wasn't nutritious. And it wasn't necessarily that I needed a larger volume of it.

Something was missing.

Satisfaction.

That was when I began to understand that I could be eating loads of nutritious food and still be starved of satisfaction.

And that mattered far more than I had previously realised.

Because being physically full didn't automatically stop me thinking about food.

If the way I was eating never really scratched that itch, part of my mind could still be waiting for the next opportunity to eat, even when my stomach wasn't asking for more food.

So once again, something I believed should make eating easier could actually leave food taking up more mental space.

And that taught me something important.

Nourishment matters.

But so does satisfaction.

So does enjoyment.

So does flexibility.

And so does being able to eat in a way that can exist within an ordinary human life.

That was when I started realising that perhaps the answer wasn't going to be found at either extreme.

It wasn't about eating as little as I could tolerate.

It wasn't about deciding calories were the only thing worth considering.

And it wasn't about trying to eat so perfectly that enjoyment, convenience and flexibility disappeared either.

Nutrition mattered.

Energy balance mattered.

My hunger signals mattered.

Satisfaction mattered.

And balance mattered.

Because while calories matter to weight loss, your body doesn't experience food only as a calorie number.

It needs energy and nutrients while you're losing weight, but it also needs to support you while you're thinking, concentrating, working, parenting, moving, sleeping, managing stress, regulating responses and generally getting through the rest of your life.

And when you're hungry, exhausted, preoccupied with food or constantly using mental energy trying to control what you desperately want to eat, that can ask something from your capacity too.

None of this means energy balance suddenly stops mattering.

It doesn't.

And it certainly doesn't mean that eating nutritious food somehow overrides the amount of energy you're consuming.

What it means is that losing weight and supporting the physical capacity of the woman who has to keep implementing the behaviours required to lose it are not necessarily the same question.

That was the perception shift for me.

For years I had asked, "Will eating this way help me lose weight?"

I hadn't spent nearly enough time asking, "What is eating this way asking from the woman who has to keep doing it?"

And once I started asking both questions, the way I looked at nutrition changed.

Now, I have my own opinions about the enormous number of eating approaches available.

Professionally, I've spent years studying and working within weight management and nutrition.

Personally, I've tried more approaches than I could probably remember if you asked me to list them all.

So of course I have opinions.

But one thing I'm always mindful of is that an approach one woman finds incredibly difficult may work really well for another.

Different women have different preferences, lifestyles, histories, appetites, routines and needs.

So where an approach is scientifically sound, safe and genuinely supportive of the woman using it, I support personal choice.

As long as that choice supports you personally.

That doesn't mean I would never challenge an eating approach.

If a woman was working with me and following something I believed was extremely restrictive, unsafe or clearly contributing to problems for her, of course I would share my concerns and explain why.

Supporting personal choice doesn't mean pretending every possible choice is equally supportive.

And my own experiences and professional learning eventually led me to develop a nutrition approach that was much more behaviour and capacity led.

But even then, I didn't suddenly decide that because this was the nutritional outlook I had arrived at, every woman who worked with me needed to adopt it too.

I've successfully worked with women who wanted to continue with Slimming World, Weight Watchers, keto and other approaches while we worked on the patterns, behaviours and capacity surrounding their ability to keep implementing them.

Their eating choice wasn't automatically mine to replace simply because they had chosen to work with me.

And that's why I'm not here to pick apart the eating approach you've chosen or give you nutritional advice you haven't asked me for.

If I don't tell women who have actually paid for my coaching exactly which eating approach they have to choose, I'm certainly not going to start doing that to a woman who came here wanting to read a free Guide and never committed to receiving my coaching advice.

You didn't come here asking me to tell you what to eat.

So I'm not going to.

What I can do is give you another lens through which to look at whatever choice you've already made.

And before we move on, I think that's worth actually doing.

So let's have a little perception check.

Not to decide whether your eating approach is good or bad.

Not to score how well you're doing.

And definitely not so I can tell you what you should be eating instead.

I just want you to look at the approach you've chosen with everything you understand now and ask yourself:

Does the way I'm eating support the energy deficit I need for my weight-loss goal without leaving me feeling as though I'm constantly fighting hunger?

How do I generally feel physically when I'm eating this way? Do I feel adequately fuelled and nourished, or am I regularly tired, foggy, headachy or depleted?

Am I considering what my body is getting from the food I'm eating, or am I mainly focused on whether it fits within a calorie, point or other allowance?

What happens to my hunger when I follow this approach?

Do I feel satisfied after eating, or can I be physically full while still feeling as though I'm waiting for something else?

How much mental space does food take up when I'm eating this way?

Does my approach help food feel calmer and more manageable, or am I spending a lot of mental and emotional capacity thinking about it, resisting it, planning around it or trying to control myself around it?

Are any of the rules within my approach interacting with patterns I already know I can be vulnerable to?

What happens when I'm tired, stressed, busy, away from home, socialising or simply don't have the same capacity I had when I started?

Can my approach adapt with me, or does it continue asking for almost exactly the same thing regardless of what I have available?

If I can't follow it perfectly, is there still somewhere for me to go?

Can I adjust what I'm doing without feeling as though I've stopped doing it altogether?

Can I return to my usual way of eating after something changes without needing another Monday, another fresh start or one final blowout first?

And perhaps the biggest question of all:

If I reached my goal weight eating this way, could some realistic version of this approach continue to exist within the life I actually live?

There isn't a result I'm hoping you'll arrive at here.

You may look at those questions and think, "Actually, yes. This does support me."

Maybe the eating approach you've chosen isn't something you need or want to change at all.

Maybe what you needed was to understand more about the patterns, beliefs, emotional responses and changes in capacity that were happening around your ability to keep implementing it.

Or some of your answers may make you pause.

Maybe you realise that something you've always interpreted as a lack of discipline looks different when you consider your hunger, energy, satisfaction, nourishment and capacity too.

Maybe you recognise that the approach works brilliantly for you in the short term, but whenever your life changes, you struggle to make it fit.

Maybe it asks more from you than you realistically want to keep giving it.

Maybe it doesn't support you physically in the way you need.

Or maybe you realise that an approach requiring almost perfect adherence simply doesn't have enough flexibility for the changing life you need to live it within.

You don't need to make a decision because of that right now.

For now, I simply want you to notice what you see when you stop asking only, "Can I lose weight eating this way?" and start asking another question alongside it.

"Does the way I've chosen to eat support the woman who has to keep implementing it?"

Because your answer to that question belongs to you.

And now that we've looked at eating less through that lens, it's probably only fair that we turn our attention to the other half of the instruction we've heard so many times.

Move more.

7- Movement Through A Wider Lens

By now, I hope you can see that capacity has been there all along.

It was there on the days when doing the things that supported your weight loss felt relatively manageable, and it was there on the days when those exact same things seemed to require far more from you.

It was there when life was relatively settled and you had more headspace to plan, prepare, make decisions and think about yourself. And it was there when life became demanding, your sleep disappeared, your stress increased, somebody needed you, something changed or simply getting through the day began asking more from you.

It was there in some of the eating approaches you followed, in the movement expectations you created, in the emotional weight you carried and in the things you began bracing for before they'd even happened.

And because capacity can influence your ability to plan, concentrate, make decisions, regulate emotional responses, prepare food, move your body, interrupt familiar patterns, adapt when something changes and keep implementing the behaviours that support your weight loss, it can also influence what happens to your weight over time.

Not because capacity somehow changes the scientific principles of weight loss. It doesn't.

But it can change the conditions in which you're trying to keep implementing them.

And at this point you may quite reasonably be thinking, "Okay, great. I understand capacity now. But I still don't really know what I'm supposed to do with it."

Fair point.

There is much more we could explore here, but I don't want to turn capacity into another complicated set of instructions or another thing you leave this Guide believing you now need to do perfectly.

So for now, I want to keep it much simpler.

When you begin working with your capacity rather than ignoring it, there are a few different things you can start considering.

Sometimes you can support it.

That can mean looking at some of the things your physical and mental capacity depend upon and asking whether they are being adequately supported.

Nutrition is one example we've already explored.

If you're trying to lose weight in a way that leaves you constantly hungry, exhausted, preoccupied with food or inadequately nourished, that can affect far more than the number on the scales.

It can affect the woman who still has to think, work, make decisions, manage emotions, move her body and live the rest of her life while losing weight.

Movement can support capacity too.

The right movement for you may support your physical health, strength, fitness, function and how you feel, rather than existing only as a way of burning calories. As we've just explored, that doesn't mean more is automatically better. Something intended to support you can become another demand if the expectations surrounding it continually exceed what you can realistically sustain.

Sleep and rest matter too.

So does recovery.

So does having periods when your brain isn't being asked to solve another problem, make another decision or meet another demand.

Supporting capacity doesn't mean creating a perfect life in which you're beautifully nourished, wonderfully rested, exercising regularly and floating around in a permanent state of calm.

Good luck with that.

It means recognising that the woman doing the work has needs too.

And sometimes, rather than asking only, "What else should I be doing?", it can be useful to ask, "What might help support me in doing what I'm already asking of myself?"

Then there are times when capacity needs protecting.

This is where boundaries can matter.

Because sometimes the answer isn't finding a way to magically create more capacity.

Sometimes it's worth looking at where the capacity you already have is going.

Are you automatically saying yes when you desperately want to say no?

Are you taking responsibility for things that don't always need to belong to you?

Are you allowing other people's expectations, demands or opinions to repeatedly take priority over your own needs?

That doesn't mean becoming selfish or refusing to help anybody because you're "protecting your capacity".

We live in relationships, families, workplaces and communities.

Sometimes people genuinely need us, and sometimes we willingly choose to give our time and energy because those people and responsibilities matter to us.

But there is a difference between choosing where you give yourself and feeling as though everybody else automatically gets first access to whatever you have available.

Protecting capacity can sometimes mean recognising that your time, attention, emotional energy and physical energy are resources too, and that boundaries can help you decide where those resources are going.

There may also be drains on your capacity that aren't necessary at all, or at least don't need to be as large as they've become.

We've already seen some of them throughout this Guide.

Bracing for judgement that hasn't happened.

Replaying something somebody said years ago.

Expecting yourself to do something perfectly.

Comparing yourself with somebody living a completely different life.

Creating movement expectations that leave no room for tiredness, work or family.

Spending enormous amounts of mental energy fighting hunger because eating less has become a competition with yourself.

Turning one choice that wasn't part of the plan into a reason to spend the rest of the day criticising yourself.

Even the constant mental negotiation of all-or-nothing thinking can ask something from you.

Should I carry on?

Have I ruined it?

Should I start again tomorrow?

Should I wait until Monday?

Should I eat this now because I'm starting again later?

None of those things necessarily looks dramatic from the outside, but capacity doesn't only get used by dramatic things.

Your attention, decision-making, emotional regulation and mental energy can be pulled in lots of directions by lots of smaller demands too.

So part of working with capacity can be noticing what is taking from it unnecessarily and asking whether anything there can be reduced, changed or approached differently.

But I also want to be very careful here, because not everything draining your capacity can be fixed.

Sometimes life is simply asking a lot from you.

Someone you love may be ill.

You may be grieving.

You may be caring for somebody.

Work may be relentless.

Money may be tight.

Your relationship may be struggling.

Your health may be affecting what you can do.

Your sleep may be disrupted by circumstances you cannot immediately change.

There are periods of life that cannot be solved with a better routine, stronger boundaries or a positive mindset.

Sometimes your capacity is lower because what you're living through is hard. And sometimes, for that period, it just is what it is.

That's where acceptance can matter.

But I want to be really clear about what I mean by acceptance, because I don't mean self-collapse.

I don't mean, "Well, my capacity is low, so fuck it."

And I don't mean abandoning yourself, your health or everything you've been working towards until some imaginary future point when life becomes perfectly manageable again.

I mean adapting what you're asking of yourself to what is actually available right now.

There is a huge difference between saying, "I can't do everything I planned, so I'm doing nothing", and saying, "I can't do everything I planned right now, so what can I realistically continue doing?"

Maybe during a difficult period your food needs to become simpler.

Maybe your usual workout becomes a walk.

Maybe three planned sessions become one.

Maybe something you would normally prepare yourself needs to be bought ready-made.

Maybe the goal for a period isn't to push harder but to maintain some of the behaviours that help you stay connected to yourself while more of your capacity is needed elsewhere.

The exact adaptation will be different for different women and different circumstances. What matters here is the principle.

Adaptation is not abandonment.

And adapting now doesn't mean deciding this is all you'll ever be capable of doing again.

You're responding to the period you're in not writing the rules for the rest of your life.

When what you have available changes, what you ask of yourself can change with it.

But there is another side to this that I think is incredibly important if we're going to talk about capacity properly.

Capacity cannot become an excuse we use to remove accountability or personal responsibility from the picture.

Understanding why something is harder doesn't automatically absolve us of responsibility for what we do next.

There will be days when your capacity genuinely is lower and what you originally planned needs to adapt.

There will also be days when you simply don't feel like doing something, when the easier choice is more appealing, when an old pattern is familiar or when doing what supports your goal requires some effort from you.

Those things are not automatically evidence of low capacity.

And I think we have to be willing to be honest with ourselves about the difference.

If every difficult choice becomes "I don't have the capacity today", then capacity hasn't become something we're working with. It's become a more sophisticated explanation for avoiding things we don't particularly want to do.

That isn't what I'm asking you to do.

I'm asking you to understand the conditions you're operating within so you can take responsibility from inside the reality of those conditions.

Sometimes that responsibility will mean recognising that you genuinely need to adapt.

Sometimes it will mean protecting your capacity by saying no to something that doesn't need to take from you.

Sometimes it will mean supporting yourself better so you have more available.

And sometimes it will mean being able to say to yourself, "Actually, I do have the capacity to do this. I just don't particularly want to right now."

Not wanting to do something is human.

Choosing the easier option sometimes is human.

Having days when you can't be bothered is human.

But if something matters to you, there will also be times when personal responsibility means doing something that requires effort, tolerating some discomfort, interrupting a familiar pattern or making a choice you don't particularly feel like making in the moment.

Working with your capacity doesn't mean only doing things when they feel easy.

It means becoming more accurate about what is actually available to you and then taking responsibility for how you use what you have.

And that means capacity awareness requires honesty as well as compassion.

If your capacity is genuinely lower, accountability might mean asking, "Okay, I can't realistically do everything I intended today. What can I still do?"

Maybe the answer is less than you originally planned.

But less is not automatically nothing.

And lower capacity doesn't automatically mean no capacity.

Equally, there will be circumstances where what you have available really is incredibly limited.

Grief, illness, crisis, caring responsibilities or periods of extreme pressure can reduce your available capacity enormously.

This isn't about forcing yourself to find productivity in every difficult human experience.

It's about being truthful about where you are.

Not using "try harder" to dismiss genuine limitations, but not using "low capacity" to dismiss personal responsibility either.

Both matter.

You can have compassion for what you're carrying and still hold yourself accountable for the choices that remain available to you.

In fact, I think that's a much more useful form of accountability than repeatedly demanding that you perform as though your circumstances never change.

It asks you to respond to reality without handing all of your agency over to it.

So perhaps another question belongs alongside, "What can I do with what I have available today?"

"Am I adapting to my capacity, or am I using it to avoid something I am actually capable of doing?"

There won't always be a perfectly clear answer.

Human beings are far more complicated than that. But being willing to ask the question matters.

And when you begin doing that, capacity can give you something I didn't have through so much of my own weight-loss history.

A middle.

Somewhere between doing everything and doing nothing.

Somewhere between following the plan exactly as intended and deciding you've stopped.

Somewhere between what you can do when life feels manageable and abandoning yourself completely when it doesn't.

And when you have a middle, a reduction doesn't automatically have to become a restart.

You can adjust and continue.

You can do less without deciding you've stopped.

You can respond to what is happening now without turning it into a permanent statement about what you'll do later.

And when more becomes available again, you can do more again without needing another Monday, another January or another promise that this time you'll finally do everything properly.

So when you think about capacity from here, you don't need to remember an enormous framework.

You can simply begin noticing.

What is supporting my capacity at the moment?

What might help strengthen it?

What do I need to protect?

What is taking from it unnecessarily?

What genuinely cannot be changed right now?

What choices are still available to me within what I have?

And am I adapting because I need to, or avoiding something I am actually capable of doing?

Those questions won't make every difficult period easy, and they won't remove every obstacle from weight loss.

But they give you somewhere very different to go from, "Why can't I just do this?"

And perhaps you can see now why capacity was such an important missing piece for me.

For years, whenever my behaviour changed, I looked almost exclusively at the behaviour itself. If I stopped meal prepping, exercised less, started eating differently, struggled with a pattern or stopped implementing something I'd previously been doing, I saw evidence that I had become inconsistent again.

I rarely asked what had changed before my behaviour changed. I didn't look at what life was asking from me, what I was carrying emotionally, what I was asking from myself physically or how much of what I had available was already being used elsewhere.

So I kept reaching the same conclusion.

I needed to try harder.

Now I had more possibilities to consider.

Sometimes I might need to support myself better.

Sometimes I might need to protect what I had.

Sometimes there might be something unnecessarily draining me that I could change.

Sometimes life might simply be asking more from me for a while, and the most useful thing I could do was adapt rather than disappear from my own priorities completely.

And sometimes, if I was being completely truthful with myself, I might have enough available and still need to take responsibility for making the choice.

Capacity didn't remove my responsibility.

It helped me understand how to take responsibility more accurately.

Because responsibility isn't only forcing yourself to keep doing exactly what you originally planned regardless of what changes around you. But neither is it abandoning what matters every time doing it becomes uncomfortable.

Sometimes responsibility is recognising that something has changed and adapting appropriately.

Sometimes it's changing something that is unnecessarily draining you.

Sometimes it's asking for support, setting a boundary or taking better care of the physical resources you're relying on.

And sometimes responsibility is simply doing the thing you know supports you even though, in that particular moment, you'd rather not.

That is why I don't want capacity to become another label you place over your behaviour.

I want it to become another part of the information you use to decide how to respond.

And I think that's where capacity changes the conversation around weight loss so significantly.

It gives us another way to understand why the same woman, with the same knowledge and sometimes even the same plan, can find implementation relatively manageable at one point and incredibly difficult at another.

It gives us somewhere to look before we automatically label that change as laziness, lack of discipline, inconsistency or failure.

But it also leaves the woman herself in the picture as somebody with agency, choices and responsibility for what she does with what she has available.

We don't need to choose between compassion and accountability.

There is room for both.

So if there is one question I want you to carry forward from this part of the Guide, it is still the simplest one.

"What can I do with what I have available today?"

Not what should I be able to do.

Not what could I do when life was different.

Not what somebody else appears able to do.

What can I do with what I have available today?

And then be honest with yourself about the answer.

Because capacity changes.

Your response can change with it.

Your accountability remains.

And your goal doesn't have to disappear in the process.

Which brings us to the final thing I want to help you do before we bring this Guide to a close.

Because you now have a very different picture of what may have been happening throughout your weight-loss history.

You understand more about implementation.

You can recognise patterns that may have been hiding in the space between losing weight and regaining it.

You've looked at beliefs, emotional weight and bracing. And now you can see how your capacity may have been influencing your ability to keep doing the things that supported your weight loss too.

You can understand all of that today.

But some of the conclusions you reached about yourself were formed long before you had any of this information.

And understanding your history differently now doesn't necessarily mean the emotional weight of those old conclusions immediately disappears with it.

So before I ask you to look at the whole picture one final time, I want to give you an opportunity to look back at your history through what you understand now.

Not so we can change what happened.

But so that what happened doesn't have to keep meaning the same thing about you.

That's where your Regain Reset begins.

8- So What Do You Do With What You Have

Okay. Now we're going to talk about food.

And if you've been waiting for this bit, you're probably thinking, "It's about bloody time."

We've made it all the way to Part Three of a weight-loss Guide and, apart from looking at some of the behaviours and patterns that can happen around food, I haven't actually told you what I think you should be eating.

And I'm not going to.

But hear me out.

Because that doesn't mean what I'm about to share won't have value to you.

So please don't let your disappointment that I'm not about to reveal that the secret to fat loss is the perfect balance of protein, carbohydrates, fats and some magical combination of foods nobody has thought to tell you about yet stop you reading.

Because as we've already recognised, there's a good chance you have a huge vault of weight-loss information stored somewhere in your noggin already.

I know I did.

By this point in my life, I knew about calories. I knew about portion sizes.

I knew about protein, carbohydrates and fats.

I knew fruit and vegetables were good for me.

I knew about fibre and hydration.

I knew how to read a food label.

I knew which foods were more calorie dense and which ones would give me more volume for fewer calories.

I'd cut carbohydrates.

I'd counted calories.

I'd followed plans that allowed certain foods freely and, at times, interpreted "unlimited" as an invitation to eat far beyond the point of hunger or satisfaction.

I'd restricted.

I'd binged.

I'd eaten convenience food.

I'd eaten what I considered incredibly "clean".

After years of dieting, I had accumulated an enormous amount of information and experience around food and weight loss.

More information wasn't necessarily the missing piece.

But do you remember near the beginning of this Guide when I told you that changing my perception of my weight-loss history gave me one of the biggest lightbulb moments of my journey?

Well, perception gave me another one around food.

Because for years, I had largely judged whether an eating approach "worked" by what happened to my body weight while I was following it.

If I lost weight, it worked.

If I stopped following it and regained weight, I stopped working.

The approach had succeeded.

I had failed to keep implementing it.

But once I began looking at weight loss through everything we've explored throughout this Guide, I realised there was another way to look at that too.

An eating approach could be capable of producing weight loss while the way I was trying to implement it could simultaneously be making continued implementation harder.

Those two things could be true at the same time.

And I had plenty of evidence of that in my own history.

There were periods when I created extremely restrictive calorie deficits because, in my mind, eating less meant losing more and losing faster meant doing better.

But there can be a cost when the amount you're eating leaves you struggling to adequately fuel and nourish your body while you're also asking it to lose weight and function through everyday life.

Hunger can increase.

You can become increasingly preoccupied with food.

Energy can fall.

Concentration can become harder.

You might experience things such as brain fog, headaches or simply feel physically awful.

I lost count of the number of times I went to bed early because I was experiencing actual hunger pains and wanted to sleep through them.

And do you know how I perceived that at the time?

As winning.

I had been hungry and I hadn't eaten.

I'd beaten the hunger.

I'd stuck to my calories.

Surely that meant I'd had a successful day?

But look at that one small behaviour through the lens we have now.

I was hungry enough that I was changing when I went to sleep to avoid eating.

The next day, I didn't wake up having somehow become better at weight loss because I'd successfully ignored my body the night before.

I could wake up still hungry, thinking about food and with another day of restriction ahead of me.

And when food is already taking up more mental space, you're tired, you're hungry and you're asking yourself to continue resisting that hunger, what else might become harder?

Making decisions.

Concentrating.

Regulating an emotional response.

Interrupting an urge.

Responding flexibly when something doesn't go to plan.

Walking past the food you've been thinking about all day and making another deliberate choice.

One apparently successful act can create a much bigger chain reaction than I ever considered at the time.

And for somebody like me, with a history of bingeing and emotional eating, repeatedly creating the conditions in which I became intensely hungry and preoccupied with food wasn't happening in isolation from those patterns either.

Yet if I eventually ate more than I'd planned, I rarely traced the sequence backwards.

I looked at the final behaviour.

I couldn't control myself.

I'd failed again.

There were other times when I went in a completely different direction.

I've cut out carbohydrates before because I'd decided carbohydrates were the problem.

I've also followed approaches where certain carbohydrate-rich foods could be eaten very freely and taken that freedom much further than my hunger required because, in my mind, if the plan said I could have them, then I could have them.

Same woman.

Different rules.

And my behaviour around food could change in response to the meaning I attached to those rules.

Then there was another experience that taught me something slightly different.

Later in my journey, I worked with a weight-loss expert and personal trainer who gave me a calorie target of around 1,600 calories a day.

Fundamentally, the message was that what I ate within those calories didn't particularly matter for weight loss as long as I stayed around the target.

And at first I thought this was brilliant.

You mean I can eat whatever I want as long as it fits within 1,600 calories?

Fantastic.

I could have a McDonald's every day if I wanted to.

And technically, I could.

If I stayed within the calorie target and it maintained the energy deficit I needed, I could still lose weight.

And I did lose weight.

So I'm not going to rewrite that experience now and pretend the approach didn't work simply because that would make the story easier to tell.

It did work for reducing my body weight.

But what I hadn't really considered was what else I was getting for those calories.

If a large proportion of my daily calories went on food that gave me relatively little volume or didn't keep me satisfied for very long, I still had to live through the rest of the day.

And it wasn't long before I was hungry again.

So yes, I could fit the food into my calories.

But then I had to manage the hunger that came afterwards while trying not to exceed them.

And when much of what I was eating was highly processed and my overall diet wasn't giving me enough of the foods, fibre, protein and nutrients that helped me feel nourished and satisfied, I wasn't creating particularly supportive conditions for myself either.

My energy wasn't great.

I wasn't particularly satisfied.

My cravings became harder to manage.

I wasn't sleeping particularly well.

My skin wasn't great.

Physically and mentally, I began feeling pretty awful.

And eventually, maintaining what I was doing became harder.

Some of the bingeing and emotional eating behaviours I had previously worked so hard to change began creeping back in.

At the time, I didn't look at the conditions in which that was happening.

I looked at my behaviour.

The diet works when I stick to it.

I'm the part that stops working.

But again, look at that through the lens we have now.

Was 1,600 calories capable of creating an energy deficit that reduced my body weight?

Yes.

Was the way I was choosing to use those calories supporting me physically in a way that helped protect the capacity I needed to keep implementing it?

That's a completely different question.

And then, because apparently I enjoyed learning things by visiting every possible end of the spectrum, I went the other way.

There was a period in my life when I became completely locked in on eating almost entirely whole foods.

And honestly, to be fair, my diet looked like something out of a health magazine.

It was picture perfect.

I was eating plenty of nutritious foods. My meals had good volume. On paper, I was doing everything right.

And yet something strange started happening.

The only way I can describe it is that I felt empty.

And I couldn't understand it.

I'd eaten enough food that physically I knew I should be full. Sometimes I'd eaten a huge plate of food.

But there was still this strange hollow feeling, almost as though I was waiting for the next meal.

Then I'd eat the next meal.

And I'd feel the same again.

It wasn't that my body hadn't received food. It wasn't that the food wasn't nutritious. And it wasn't necessarily that I needed a larger volume of it.

Something was missing.

Satisfaction.

That was when I began to understand that I could be eating loads of nutritious food and still be starved of satisfaction.

And that mattered far more than I had previously realised.

Because being physically full didn't automatically stop me thinking about food.

If the way I was eating never really scratched that itch, part of my mind could still be waiting for the next opportunity to eat, even when my stomach wasn't asking for more food.

So once again, something I believed should make eating easier could actually leave food taking up more mental space.

And that taught me something important.

Nourishment matters.

But so does satisfaction.

So does enjoyment.

So does flexibility.

And so does being able to eat in a way that can exist within an ordinary human life.

That was when I started realising that perhaps the answer wasn't going to be found at either extreme.

It wasn't about eating as little as I could tolerate.

It wasn't about deciding calories were the only thing worth considering.

And it wasn't about trying to eat so perfectly that enjoyment, convenience and flexibility disappeared either.

Nutrition mattered.

Energy balance mattered.

My hunger signals mattered.

Satisfaction mattered.

And balance mattered.

Because while calories matter to weight loss, your body doesn't experience food only as a calorie number.

It needs energy and nutrients while you're losing weight, but it also needs to support you while you're thinking, concentrating, working, parenting, moving, sleeping, managing stress, regulating responses and generally getting through the rest of your life.

And when you're hungry, exhausted, preoccupied with food or constantly using mental energy trying to control what you desperately want to eat, that can ask something from your capacity too.

None of this means energy balance suddenly stops mattering.

It doesn't.

And it certainly doesn't mean that eating nutritious food somehow overrides the amount of energy you're consuming.

What it means is that losing weight and supporting the physical capacity of the woman who has to keep implementing the behaviours required to lose it are not necessarily the same question.

That was the perception shift for me.

For years I had asked, "Will eating this way help me lose weight?"

I hadn't spent nearly enough time asking, "What is eating this way asking from the woman who has to keep doing it?"

And once I started asking both questions, the way I looked at nutrition changed.

Now, I have my own opinions about the enormous number of eating approaches available.

Professionally, I've spent years studying and working within weight management and nutrition.

Personally, I've tried more approaches than I could probably remember if you asked me to list them all.

So of course I have opinions.

But one thing I'm always mindful of is that an approach one woman finds incredibly difficult may work really well for another.

Different women have different preferences, lifestyles, histories, appetites, routines and needs.

So where an approach is scientifically sound, safe and genuinely supportive of the woman using it, I support personal choice.

As long as that choice supports you personally.

That doesn't mean I would never challenge an eating approach.

If a woman was working with me and following something I believed was extremely restrictive, unsafe or clearly contributing to problems for her, of course I would share my concerns and explain why.

Supporting personal choice doesn't mean pretending every possible choice is equally supportive.

And my own experiences and professional learning eventually led me to develop a nutrition approach that was much more behaviour and capacity led.

But even then, I didn't suddenly decide that because this was the nutritional outlook I had arrived at, every woman who worked with me needed to adopt it too.

I've successfully worked with women who wanted to continue with Slimming World, Weight Watchers, keto and other approaches while we worked on the patterns, behaviours and capacity surrounding their ability to keep implementing them.

Their eating choice wasn't automatically mine to replace simply because they had chosen to work with me.

And that's why I'm not here to pick apart the eating approach you've chosen or give you nutritional advice you haven't asked me for.

If I don't tell women who have actually paid for my coaching exactly which eating approach they have to choose, I'm certainly not going to start doing that to a woman who came here wanting to read a free Guide and never committed to receiving my coaching advice.

You didn't come here asking me to tell you what to eat.

So I'm not going to.

What I can do is give you another lens through which to look at whatever choice you've already made.

And before we move on, I think that's worth actually doing.

So let's have a little perception check.

Not to decide whether your eating approach is good or bad.

Not to score how well you're doing.

And definitely not so I can tell you what you should be eating instead.

I just want you to look at the approach you've chosen with everything you understand now and ask yourself:

Does the way I'm eating support the energy deficit I need for my weight-loss goal without leaving me feeling as though I'm constantly fighting hunger?

How do I generally feel physically when I'm eating this way? Do I feel adequately fuelled and nourished, or am I regularly tired, foggy, headachy or depleted?

Am I considering what my body is getting from the food I'm eating, or am I mainly focused on whether it fits within a calorie, point or other allowance?

What happens to my hunger when I follow this approach?

Do I feel satisfied after eating, or can I be physically full while still feeling as though I'm waiting for something else?

How much mental space does food take up when I'm eating this way?

Does my approach help food feel calmer and more manageable, or am I spending a lot of mental and emotional capacity thinking about it, resisting it, planning around it or trying to control myself around it?

Are any of the rules within my approach interacting with patterns I already know I can be vulnerable to?

What happens when I'm tired, stressed, busy, away from home, socialising or simply don't have the same capacity I had when I started?

Can my approach adapt with me, or does it continue asking for almost exactly the same thing regardless of what I have available?

If I can't follow it perfectly, is there still somewhere for me to go?

Can I adjust what I'm doing without feeling as though I've stopped doing it altogether?

Can I return to my usual way of eating after something changes without needing another Monday, another fresh start or one final blowout first?

And perhaps the biggest question of all:

If I reached my goal weight eating this way, could some realistic version of this approach continue to exist within the life I actually live?

There isn't a result I'm hoping you'll arrive at here.

You may look at those questions and think, "Actually, yes. This does support me."

Maybe the eating approach you've chosen isn't something you need or want to change at all.

Maybe what you needed was to understand more about the patterns, beliefs, emotional responses and changes in capacity that were happening around your ability to keep implementing it.

Or some of your answers may make you pause.

Maybe you realise that something you've always interpreted as a lack of discipline looks different when you consider your hunger, energy, satisfaction, nourishment and capacity too.

Maybe you recognise that the approach works brilliantly for you in the short term, but whenever your life changes, you struggle to make it fit.

Maybe it asks more from you than you realistically want to keep giving it.

Maybe it doesn't support you physically in the way you need.

Or maybe you realise that an approach requiring almost perfect adherence simply doesn't have enough flexibility for the changing life you need to live it within.

You don't need to make a decision because of that right now.

For now, I simply want you to notice what you see when you stop asking only, "Can I lose weight eating this way?" and start asking another question alongside it.

"Does the way I've chosen to eat support the woman who has to keep implementing it?"

Because your answer to that question belongs to you.

And now that we've looked at eating less through that lens, it's probably only fair that we turn our attention to the other half of the instruction we've heard so many times.

Move more.